Evaluation form

3rd Les Houches School in computational physics: DNA, from molecules to evolution - May 20-31, 2013

Last name (optional) First name (optional)

I. OUTCOME 1. The Summer School broadened my understanding of concepts and principles in the field of computational physics ^*

2. The Summer School improved my ability to carry out original research in the field of computational physics ^*

3. The Summer School improved significantly my computational skills ^*

4. The Summer School taught me techniques directly applicable to my career ^*

5. The material presented in the Summer School was relevant to my research ^*

6. The School helped me to meet new people working in my field ^*

II. LECTURES 1. The instructors' knowledge of the subjects was good ^*

2.The instructors explained the material well ^*

3.The instructors provided real-world examples ^*

4.The lectures were coordinated between instructors ^*

5.Lectures incorporated recent developments in the field ^*

6.The range of lectures captured the overall essentials of the field ^*

7.The level of the lectures was appropriate ^*

8.The underlying rationale of the techniques presented was clear ^*

9.We were exposed to a well representative range of techniques ^*

10.The instructors stimulated my intellectual curiosity ^*

11. The lecturers gave good answers to our questions ^*

III. PRACTICAL WORK 1.The practical work sessions were important for the learning process in the summer School ^* 2.The jobs we ran during the hands-on sessions were useful for understanding the material ^* 3.The concrete examples in the hands-on tutorials increased my understanding of the lectures ^* 4.The hands-on sessions were long enough ^* 5.The hands-on sessions were coordinated with the lectures ^* 6. Instructors were well-prepared to answer questions ^* 7.There were sufficient instructions to proceed with the hands-on assignments ^*

IV. ENVIRONMENT & TECHNICAL RESOURCES 1.The technical environment was adequate ^* 2.The Small laptop cluster was useful ^* 3.The laptops provided by the school were necessary ^* 4.School access to the Internet was sufficient ^*

V. COMMUNICATION & DISSEMINATION 1.Instructors were readily available for Q&A outside the lecture periods ^* 2.The Summer School web site was informative before the school started ^* 3.The Summer School web site was informative during the school period ^* 4.The online information was up-to-date ^* 5.The online material was organized ^*

VI. GENERAL ORGANIZATION 1.The number of participants was reasonable ^* 2.The cost of the School was reasonable ^* 3.There were enough support staff to help the participants ^*

VII. OVERALL SATISFACTION 1.Overall technical support was good ^* 2.Overall general support was good ^* 3.The Summer School was well organized ^* 4.The balance between lectures and hands-on sessions was good ^* 5.The Summer School addressed my research needs ^* 6.Overall, the Summer School met my expectations ^*

VIII. COMMENTS 1.What suggestions do you have for improving the summer school? ^* 2.What suggestions do you have for similar workshops? ^*

Submission

Merci de recopier le code ci-contre pour prouver que vous êtes humain : M P S U S Merci de laisser ce champ vide :

animation/tutoriels/2013/houches/evaluation/accueil.1371131590.txt.gz · Dernière modification: 2015/01/07 10:04 (modification externe)

Rechercher

Translations

Traductions de cette page:

Navigation

accueil
animation
- appels
- projets
- seminaires
- tutoriels
  - 2009
  - 2010
  - 2011
  - 2012
  - 2013
    - houches
      - evaluation
      - venue
    - catalyse
    - fetescience
    - xml
  - 2014
  - 2015
  - 2016
  - 2017
  - 2018
- workshops
- evenements
- medias
- principles
- services
contact
developpement
en
etudes
formation
recherche
reseaux
ressources
wiki
developpementdurablenumerique
menu
navigation

Piste:

Piste: • evaluation

Boîte à outils